Per Music Enterprise Worldwide, Tidal CEO Richard Sanders spouted the standard firm line about taking its information and buyer safety critically earlier than divulging that he’d employed a cybersecurity company to research a possible safety failure.
That is bizarre for a number of causes. For starters, when Norwegian publication Dagens Næringsliv (DN) printed its report in regards to the information manipulation, Tidal advised Engadget that it was a “smear marketing campaign.” Greater than that, a spokesperson advised us that the story was ridiculous and filled with “lies and falsehoods,” claiming the onerous drive DN acquired was stolen.
Regardless that Tidal has mentioned the information on the drive was bunk, nonetheless, it apparently matched precisely with what it offered report labels in the course of the time period in query.
When the Norwegian College of Science and Expertise examined mentioned onerous drive and information, it acknowledged (PDF) that:
“The absence of data with unreadable information urged it was not an exterior Structured Question Language Injection(SQLi) vector based mostly attacked, however somewhat manipulation from throughout the streaming service itself. As a result of focused nature and extent of the manipulation, it is rather unlikely that this manipulation was solely the results of a code based mostly bug or different system anomaly.”
“We reject and deny the claims which have been made by DN,” Sanders mentioned. “Though we don’t sometimes touch upon tales we imagine to be false, we really feel it is very important make it possible for our artists, staff and subscribers know that we’re not taking the safety and integrity of our information calmly, and we won’t again down from our dedication to them.”